When often do not support performance being improved

When athletes are expected to perform, the
body becomes highly dependent on carbohydrates (CHO) to fuel performance. Within
the human body, there are limited CHO stores that are only sufficient to fuel
up to 3 hours of prolonged, sub-maximal exercise (70-80% maximal oxygen uptake
VO2max),
with muscle fatigue and impairment of exercise capacity being evident with the
reduction of CHO reserves (Burke and Hawley, 2002). Athletes are challenged to
hold and demonstrate a wide variety of complex characteristics in order to succeed
in sporting events that vary in duration ranging from sprints to
ultra-endurance events. The idealisation of training is to accumulate
physiological adaptations in order to improve athletic performance and success through
the combination of nutrition and exercise (Burke, 2015).  It is key that endurance athletes implement strategies
to optimise rate of glycogen use during not only training but also endurance
events. Nutritional schemes are
employed to optimise athletic performance including CHO-loading (Hawley et al.,
1997), consuming a CHO-rich meal before exercise (Hawley and Burke, 1997) and
consuming CHO throughout an event (Coyle et al., 1986), all of which have been
shown to improve endurance performance. An alternative method to
enhance exercise capacity involves utilisation of a different fuel source, fat.
Evident within even lean athletes, fat stores are abundant and provide a fuel
source for exercise lasting up to several days (Burke and Hawley, 2002). A classic
response to exercise includes physiological changes within the body that allow
for fat oxidation to fuel exercise, therefore a high fat diet has been
suggested as a strategy to utilise fat and augment fat oxidation (Burke and
Hawley, 2002). Over recent years
publicity for fat adaptation amongst athletes has continued to be prevelant,
however when interpreting data from studies evaluating the effect of fat
adaption results often do not support performance being improved whilst there
are frequent methodological flaws. This paper critically evaluates the
literature on this paradigm for training adaptation and the effects of fat
adaptation strategies. Fat-Adaption pre-exercise:There is evidence to suggest that short term
fat adaptation is detrimental to performance due to muscle glycogen levels
becoming reduced without any compensation for reduced CHO availability (Burke
et al., 2001). Appendix one highlights studies conducted that evaluate the
effects of short term fat adaptation prior to exercise.  Okano et al., (1996) studied the effect of a high-CHO
meal (HCM) and high-fat meal (HFM) given 4 hours before a cycling protocol concluding that there was no significant
difference between diet plans when measuring heart rate, oxygen consumption and
perceived exertion during exercise however respiratory exchange ratio in HCM
group was significantly higher during the first
40 minutes of exercise alongside a significantly higher serum insulin level at
the start of exercise. These results are suggestive that a single HCM and HFM
given 4 h before exercise influences fuel utilization in the initial stages of
prolonged cycling, but these meals may have little effect on endurance capacity. Similarly, Whitley et al., (1998) found
increased plasma insulin levels during exercise alongside increased plasma epinephrine and
growth hormone concentrations however despite these differences in substrate
and hormone concentrations, a high-fat meal prior to exercise failed to alter
fuel utilisation during 90 minutes moderate intensity exercise as substrate
oxidation during endurance exercise is remarkably resistant to alteration. Fat-Adaptation 5 days:It is thought that a longer period of fat
adaptation through the implementation of a high-fat, low-CHO diet (>6 days)
may allow for metabolic adaptations to enhance rates of fat oxidation and
compensate for reduced CHO availability (Burke and Hawley, 2002). Appendix
three outlines the effects of fat adaptation studies for >5 days. Despite this idealisation, Burke et al.,
(2017) concluded that a fat adaptation diet is not optimal for performance
benefits in elite athletes. Results demonstrated that despite improvements
being evident in peak aerobic capacity, performance was impaired in elite
endurance athletes’ due to reduced exercise economy. However, there was a
limited duration of the study to only 3 weeks alongside the application of
slightly hypocaloric diets. Similarly, Paoli et al., (2012) also found no
significant differences when comparing a modified ketogenic diet in elite
artistic gymnasts, however there are several methodological flaws evident
within the study. It is questionable whether the strength tests used were hard
enough to challenge the gymnasts in order to see physiological changes. Adaptation
to ketogenic diet is thought to take 4-6 weeks therefore a longer period to
study the physiological effects is recommended. Body fat was measured through
use of skin folds however DEXA would have produced more reliable results due to
the low-CHO diet consisting of diuretics and the fact that diuretics reduce
skin-folds. Hulston et al., (2010) found that fat
oxidation was utilised under low glycogen training which demonstrates that the
body does not need to rely on CHO consumption to fuel performance. However,
this way of training may be counter-productive for anaerobic athletes as no
improvement in performance was seen, despite the physiological changes. Whilst
results from this study do not apply to athletes other than cyclists. In a study conducted looking at fat adaption
in Taekwondo athletes, despite there being no improvement in performance, Rhyu
and Cho (2014) found that a ketogenic diet (high-fat, low CHO) is helpful for
weight category athletes as after 3 weeks, weight, % body fat, BMI and lean
muscle decreased. In contrast to these findings, Cochran et
al., (2015) saw an improvement in performance, however further research needs
to be conducted to see if these results can be carried over into highly-trained
individuals. A well-publicised study conducted by Phinney
et al., (1983) took 5 well-trained cyclists who consumed a fat adaption diet over
a 4-week period followed by completion of a ride to exhaustion..Results
demonstrated that four subjects showed minimal changes and impairment in
exercise capacity post high-fat diet, however one cyclist demonstrated an
abnormally large improvement in performance, thus altering overall results. It
is difficult to apply results to high intensity endurance events or sprints due
to the protocol being undertaken at fixed submaximal workload, only equivalent
to ultra-endurance events. A
cross-over design study by Lambert et al., (1994) evaluated the effects of a
2-week fat adaption diet on trained cyclists during multiple cycling protocols however
it is difficult to isolate the effects of the different dietary protocols on
performance due to two different cycling protocols having been applied. Furthermore, the cycling protocol used
within the study makes it hard to relate to real-life sporting events.  Goedecke et al., (1999) also failed to
demonstrate improved performance, however, despite
lack of improvement in performance, a major finding from the study demonstrated
that rates of fat oxidation during submaximal exercise were increased following
only 5 days of a high-fat diet (Goedecke et al., 1999). This finding is key as
it is suggestive that only after a relatively small period of dietary
adaptation to a high-fat diet, there is a metabolic shift, increasing fat
utilisation which would be far better tolerated by athletes than a prolonged
period of fat adaption. Fat-Adaption
combined with CHO restoration:Despite the current lack of evidence for
short term fat adaption improving performance, it is thought that the
restoration of glycogen following a period of fat-adaption could theoretically
provide athletes with the opportunity to tap into both glycolytic and lipolytic
pathways during exercise and thus enhance fuel provision (Hawley and Hopkins,
1995). Appendix four outlines studies examining the effects of a high-fat,
low-CHO in combination with CHO restoration. Havemann et al, (2006) hypothesised that a LCHF
strategy would create a glycogen-sparing effect when in contrast, it
compromised high-intensity 1-km sprint performance in 8 well-trained cyclists
despite fat oxidation being evident. It is questionable whether this was due to
increased sympathetic activation, altered contractile function and/or the
inability to oxidise the available carbohydrate during the high intensity
sprints (Havemann et al., 2006). Consuming high levels of fat created a greater
reliance on fat and reduced CHO oxidation which persisted despite 1 day of CHO
loading (Havemann et al., 2006). An advantage to this study is how the authors included
high-intensity sprints alongside endurance exercise (mean power output during
1-km sprints >90% of Wpeak) which allowed for the simulation of race
conditions and thus becoming representative to real-life sporting events. Findings are consistent with Burke et al.,
(2000) and Carey et al. (2001), who also demonstrated an increase in fat
oxidation with a short-term high-fat diet that persisted even after restoration
of CHO levels (Havemann et al., 2006). Carey et al., (2001) demonstrated
that fat oxidation increased during prolonged submaximal exercise, however,
despite the sparing of CHO, this study failed to detect a significant benefit
to performance of a 1-h TT. A logical conclusion for this could be contributed
to there being too small sample size creating an ergogenic effect and as a
result of small sample size being unable to exclude type II error. Whilst the
use of dietary records has the potential for bias and miss-reporting, and more
predominantly, under-reporting which was the method of data collection (Tooze
et al., 2012)Burke et al., (2000) measured
muscle glycogen levels over a 5 day-period of fat-adaptation concluding that 1
day of rest and CHO loading was sufficient to restore muscle glycogen levels to
above baseline whilst resulting in a significant reduction in muscle glycogen
utilisation during a 120-min cycle at ~70% max O2 consumption. In contrast to Havemann et
al., (2006) both studies conducted by Carey et al., (2001) and Burke et al.,
(2001) did not simulate race conditions as in order to do so, high intensity
sprint bouts (>90% of Wpeak) are integral to performance. Conclusion: 

The current paper has discussed the use of
fat adaption over varying periods of time and despite the enhanced capacity of
utilisation of an abundant fuel source, fat adaptation does not appear to
improve exercise capacity or performance. This may be allocated to significant
methodological flaws conducted within studies with type II statistical error
and a failure to detect small change being a common flaw evident. A critic
highlighted from all studies discussed within this paper is the small sample
size used, making it hard to detect small changes and difficulty making results
representative to the general population. Type II statistical error may also
occur due to poor reliability of the performance protocols whilst findings are
limited to the specific protocols used within studies. Another issue is that
benefits are limited to specific individuals.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now