The in the case of economic development and

 

The public opinion regarding the
European Union usually corresponds to the overall state of the national
economy. Economy’s ties to the sentiment regarding EU can never be overstated,
and thus should be recognized as an important determinant of how many policies
will be perceived. The existing EU policies are
usually credited in the case
of economic development and vice versa. Communicating the role of the EU in
various developments and managing the public image that appears to be mostly
abandoned is the first step towards a sustainable policy pursuit and a healthy
public opinion trend. The focus should be on the fact that, without a doubt,
every single policy adopted by the EU is intended to benefit each European in
the long term. In convincing the Europeans that a person living in Bordeaux is
not prioritized in comparison to a person living in Prague, a common identity
has to be preserved and the Eastern parts of the Eurozone are particularly
concerned regarding the consideration of them as equals of Western Europeans.
As a result, a group of people who are socially insecure of their position in a
potentially integrated EU and a group of people who tend to view their national
and personal interests irreconcilable with those of the EU have
lead to the state in which we find ourselves.

The EU’s response to Brexit was to
change legislative trajectory, accelerating the process of full
integration, the exact reason why many
of the anti-establishment parties would like to leave the EU. If the European
Commission and the European Union leadership stay on this track, the divide
will only get worse and the widespread concerns as a result of which Euroscepticism
came to exist will exacerbate. Another important issue that is usually avoided
in discussing Euroscepticism is the overall dissatisfaction the regular
European feels towards the EU. In the UK, UKIP appeared to be the only major
Eurosceptic political party. This was not enough to convince the British to
vote against leaving the EU,
against a campaign lead by the same person who leads UKIP. General
dissatisfaction cannot always be tracked through the popularity of
anti-establishment political parties. In order for the European Union to
achieve its vision of integration until 2025, the questions raised regarding
the transparency and intentions of the EU should be answered. The leadership of
EU is a big blur in the minds of the majority of the Europeans and its leading
bodies consisting of unelected bureaucrats appear to be elitist in nature or otherwise.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The European Union is facing a very important
crisis that threatens the mere existence of itself. As a result of this crisis,
many have come to question the capability of the European Union to pursue its
designated goals and its long-standing vision of full or advanced integration.
The EU’s failure to succeed in achieving these designated goals should come as
no question in the midst of local power struggles in almost every single member
state. In almost every single member state, with several exceptions, there is a
rising sentiment on which anti-establishment parties have been able to tap.
This rising sentiment of European antipathy has been exploited by political
outsiders to an unprecedented degree. We’re talking about a level of fragility
at which the member state with the largest economy is pushed to leave the
Union. Such a widespread trend causes the pro-EU ruling parties to adopt
policies that are intended to appease the sceptical portion of the population.
Ignoring the concerns and questions raised by Euro sceptics was possible, right
until they started to show up in the polls. In Germany, the AFD has recently
entered the Bundestag. For the majority of the Dutch presidential campaign, the
far-right Eurosceptic Geert Wilders was tipped to win the election. It comes as
no surprise
that the Liberal president of the
Netherlands switched to a rather right
wing message with anti-immigrant undertones. The immediate problem facing the
EU and its member states, therefore, is the shifting of the spectrum towards
right in many social issues, making the so-called “soft Euro
sceptics” the new norm.