Social control theory is based on data collected over time. Therefore, it cannot directly address the issues of change and transition. However, the design of this issue of change and transition is firmly in mind. If the link between juvenile delinquency and adult crime depends on unforeseen events, there is no problem with the theory. It assumes that strong bonds may weaken or break, and people and institutions may change their character or cease to exist. It also assumes that weak keys can be enhanced, and that they can be built where they did not exist before. Therefore, the theory of social control is considered as the only major theory that can deal with the changes of crime and crime in life. But existing data suggest that the truth is not so complicated. The data shows that the level of individual crime is relatively stable, and the distribution of the crime age distribution is the same as that of the group. According to the Hirschi and Michael Gottfredson rejected the idea of a crime life course clearly, they said that once a criminal act was established in the late childhood, the criminal behavior would be stable and constant.(Hirschi, Michael Gottfredson, 1995) In other words, they said that if a researcher ranked a child at age 8, he or she could find the same grade at any age at 15 and beyond. They argue that no theory of criminology, including social control theory, can explain the relationship between age and crime (Hirschi, Michael Gottfredson, 1983). The current crime control policy in the United States emphasizes the value of imprisonment and treatment or rehabilitation on the one hand. A further increase in academic interest in so-called “professional criminals” and the swift, definitive and rigorous punishment of agents who believe criminal justice requires a criminal justice system have exacerbated the incarceration rate. Politicians, the media, an influential part of academic criminology and of course the focus of law enforcement on their own to encourage punishment. Crime is a boon to them, and they do not lose it. Care and the improvement of punishment will automatically generate more potential offenders, probation, prisoners and parole – they are considered to benefit from the modern treatment and rehabilitation scheme. Believe it to punish provides a humane alternative, therefore encourage to treatment. It is also encouraging to believe that it is effective in reducing the amount of criminal and illegal behavior. Recently, where treatment has not been considered effective, it is now possible to answer the question of validity in advance by advocating evidence-based programs. Emphasis on treatment is from the group of sociologists, psychologists, social workers and social services. Social control theory often does not provide concrete and positive guidance on crime control policies. Those who attack their policy implications tend to focus on the abhorrent implications of “control,” suggesting that control theorists tend to be selectively disabled and attach importance to the ignorance of individual freedom. Control theorists may be partly unwilling to play a policy game for this reason, but the policy implications of control theory may be self-evident. If weakening social ties is a cause of criminal activity, the direct way to reduce the problem of crime is to help individuals to strengthen their relationship with society.