2.0 Reflective Cycle Model
Cycle model includes description (When and where did this happen?), feeling (what do I feel?), evaluation (positive and negative situation), analysis (What sense can be made of the situation?), conclusion (what was the result?) and action plan (possible actions).
According to given task, the group involves team of four people. Afterwards, our formed group has written a questionnaire to conduct a survey among students (at least 50). First problem that we faced when and where our group could gather to discuss the task. From personal performance in the team, I am more of a plant, but I incline to be protecting of certain information and not too open to communication (which is an allowed weakness according to Belbin, 1994).
I know that I am not open to sharing information but I did not guess that my team members have noticed it. After gathering, obviously, the designation is a decent element; regardless it may not work on the off chance that one of the individuals does not have any desire to assume liability. Unfortunately, we have faced with it; consequently, instead of that person another member had to take an extra duty. Therefore, productivity of the work was weakened.
Encountering with this problem, some of fellow students` skills to motivate others members was helpful. We found a compromise, which satisfied others. Every member had own experience and background, and demonstrated his or her strong side, while working together we can learn something new from another person. Hence, such an understanding influenced me to feel extremely awkward as I comprehended that different individuals from the group have emotions as well and want access to the thoughts have I have for the proceeded with development of the group.
From an investigative perspective, it ought to be noticed that my activities are a result of my wants to guarantee that the information provided to my fellow group are right, because I am deeply concerned about passing information that can deliver negative outcomes. I additionally would prefer not to be faulted by team members for their general execution, because of the information I imparted to them (Jelps and Dickson, 2008). In addition, working in a group implies that all individuals from the group should built up some level of mindfulness aptitudes and furthermore forces the capacity to convey straightforwardly and successfully for the sole motivation behind gathering the delicate needs of all members in the group.